… might never become frieds :-(
P1010411.JPG exceeds the maximum upload size for this site.
Holy shit, this is my bloody site and I do want to upload this 5.7 MB image. Gnampf! #tw

blogdoch — jetzt wird zurückgeblogt
… might never become frieds :-(
P1010411.JPG exceeds the maximum upload size for this site.
Holy shit, this is my bloody site and I do want to upload this 5.7 MB image. Gnampf! #tw

[exif id=”9589″]
Leider nur HSPA+ hier; Vodafone hat zwar die 4G-Keule geschwungen, aber nach dem connect kommt gleich der disconnect :-( #tw
#fb #tw
I’m really a bit confused right now. I want to use apache2’s mod_rewrite to link from the previous blog (powerded by locally hacked SPHPBLOG) to my new, shiny, WordPress-driven one. Therefore old links like /index.php?entry=entry120414-202918 need to be redirected to http://v2.blogdoch.net/2012/04/ …
So, what I tried was:
RewriteRule ^/index.php\?entry=entry([0-9][0-9])([0-9][0-9])([0-9][0-9])-202918 http://v2.blogdoch.net/20$1/$2/ [R,L]
Above does not fire at all. The followings does, but a bit unexpected:
RewriteRule ^/index.*[^=](.*)$ http://v2.blogdoch.net/old/$1 [R=302,L]
I call "Location: http://v2.blogdoch.net/old/?entry=entry120414-202918” unexpected on a "wget http://blogdoch.net/index.php?entry=entry120414-202918” here. WTF is going on? I’d expect “entry120414-202918“, but not everything after, and including, “?” — is my regexp foo that rusty?!
Any hints appreciated ;)
Grade mit meinem Multi-Link-AP kurz nach dem Halt in Hannover Hbf ausprobiert, als der USB-Stick mir Vodafone-SIM LTE signalisierte:
Tue Apr 24 07:34:48 CEST 2012 PING gw-d2.uu.org (193.26.120.206) 56(84) bytes of data. --- gw-d2.uu.org ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9082ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.021/42.213/51.538/4.231 ms
Zum Vergleich, D1 mit baugleichem Stick (Huawei K5005) und o2 mit Huawei E1550:
Tue Apr 24 07:34:49 CEST 2012 PING gw-d1.uu.org (193.26.120.204) 56(84) bytes of data. --- gw-d1.uu.org ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 11814ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 216.279/3340.028/7213.291/2193.227 ms, pipe 8/
Tue Apr 24 07:34:49 CEST 2012 PING gw-o2.uu.org (193.26.120.208) 56(84) bytes of data. --- gw-o2.uu.org ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9778ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 208.762/291.890/508.182/78.296 ms
Alles, wohlgemerkt, aus dem schon wieder fahrenden ICE.
(Die Verbindung läuft über OpenVPN (per UDP) über dedizierte Endpunkt-IPs an einem Server im ‘Festnetz’, die über die jeweile PPP-Verbindung der USB-Mobilfunkmodems geroutet werden. Das alleine ist schon ein Big Win bei den laufend abbrechenden PPP-Sessions wegen Abdeckungsmangel …)
Ein bißchen später, so in Höhe Gifhorn im ICE 541, sieht das dann allerdings auch anders aus:
Tue Apr 24 07:57:09 CEST 2012 PING gw-d1.uu.org (193.26.120.204) 56(84) bytes of data. --- gw-d1.uu.org ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9006ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 10064.308/12367.812/15869.452/1888.586 ms, pipe 10
Tue Apr 24 07:57:08 CEST 2012 PING gw-d2.uu.org (193.26.120.206) 56(84) bytes of data. --- gw-d2.uu.org ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 8 received, 20% packet loss, time 57635ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 984.208/2262.540/3884.146/834.960 ms, pipe 3
Tue Apr 24 07:57:07 CEST 2012 PING gw-o2.uu.org (193.26.120.208) 56(84) bytes of data. --- gw-o2.uu.org ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 85126ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 590.445/1558.000/4091.427/1151.067 ms, pipe 2
Internet im ICE — noch immer ein Abenteuer ;) Zum Abschluß — auch der Reise ;) — nochmal Pings aus dem stehenden ICE im Bahnhof Berlin.-SPandau, mit LTE bei D2:
Tue Apr 24 08:58:11 CEST 2012 PING gw-d1.uu.org (193.26.120.204) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from gw-d1.uu.org (193.26.120.204): icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=886 ms 64 bytes from gw-d1.uu.org (193.26.120.204): icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=1327 ms 64 bytes from gw-d1.uu.org (193.26.120.204): icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=334 ms 64 bytes from gw-d1.uu.org (193.26.120.204): icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=107 ms 64 bytes from gw-d1.uu.org (193.26.120.204): icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=107 ms 64 bytes from gw-d1.uu.org (193.26.120.204): icmp_req=6 ttl=64 time=155 ms 64 bytes from gw-d1.uu.org (193.26.120.204): icmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=94.9 ms 64 bytes from gw-d1.uu.org (193.26.120.204): icmp_req=8 ttl=64 time=103 ms 64 bytes from gw-d1.uu.org (193.26.120.204): icmp_req=9 ttl=64 time=112 ms 64 bytes from gw-d1.uu.org (193.26.120.204): icmp_req=10 ttl=64 time=221 ms --- gw-d1.uu.org ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9494ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 94.927/345.152/1327.262/399.590 ms, pipe 2
Tue Apr 24 08:58:11 CEST 2012 PING gw-d2.uu.org (193.26.120.206) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from gw-d2.uu.org (193.26.120.206): icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=69.6 ms 64 bytes from gw-d2.uu.org (193.26.120.206): icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=65.4 ms 64 bytes from gw-d2.uu.org (193.26.120.206): icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=69.4 ms 64 bytes from gw-d2.uu.org (193.26.120.206): icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=65.5 ms 64 bytes from gw-d2.uu.org (193.26.120.206): icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=57.1 ms 64 bytes from gw-d2.uu.org (193.26.120.206): icmp_req=6 ttl=64 time=59.9 ms 64 bytes from gw-d2.uu.org (193.26.120.206): icmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=62.1 ms 64 bytes from gw-d2.uu.org (193.26.120.206): icmp_req=8 ttl=64 time=60.8 ms 64 bytes from gw-d2.uu.org (193.26.120.206): icmp_req=9 ttl=64 time=61.0 ms 64 bytes from gw-d2.uu.org (193.26.120.206): icmp_req=10 ttl=64 time=71.0 ms --- gw-d2.uu.org ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9006ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 57.137/64.225/71.063/4.502 ms
Tue Apr 24 08:58:12 CEST 2012 PING gw-o2.uu.org (193.26.120.208) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from gw-o2.uu.org (193.26.120.208): icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=687 ms 64 bytes from gw-o2.uu.org (193.26.120.208): icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=729 ms 64 bytes from gw-o2.uu.org (193.26.120.208): icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=229 ms 64 bytes from gw-o2.uu.org (193.26.120.208): icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=559 ms 64 bytes from gw-o2.uu.org (193.26.120.208): icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=319 ms 64 bytes from gw-o2.uu.org (193.26.120.208): icmp_req=6 ttl=64 time=239 ms 64 bytes from gw-o2.uu.org (193.26.120.208): icmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=239 ms 64 bytes from gw-o2.uu.org (193.26.120.208): icmp_req=8 ttl=64 time=239 ms 64 bytes from gw-o2.uu.org (193.26.120.208): icmp_req=9 ttl=64 time=239 ms 64 bytes from gw-o2.uu.org (193.26.120.208): icmp_req=10 ttl=64 time=239 ms --- gw-o2.uu.org ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9367ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 229.667/372.074/729.099/193.154 ms
Leider ist o2 derzeit, was die RTT angeht, deutlichst im Hintertreffen; 200ms bei einer HSPA-Verbindung ist … unzureichend :-(
… to WordPress.

Denn der Sascha hat ja Recht …
